The Cultural Psychological Impact of Educators’ Identity on the Concept of International Mindedness in the International Baccalaureate Program
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work examines the International Baccalaureate (IB) program’s concept of international-mindedness and its application to school cultures at the International School of Prague. Its objective is to analyze the concept of international-mindedness with three different levels of identifiers (educator-self, educator-self vs. students, educator-self vs. outside school environment) to express that the nebulous and equivocal educator identity in international school(s) is veritably more complex than what is defined by the IB. Two approaches to identity in individualist and collectivist societies will be discussed to understand the identity of educators. Based on interviews with four educators at the International School of Prague, this article shows that separating “international-mindedness” from “international” can create conflicting identities among educators, particularly between individualist and collectivist self-identities, and it ultimately concludes that no sole international mind exists due to the dialectical and exclusionary nature of various international-mind identifications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".