Interpretable convolutional neural network for autism diagnosis support in children using structural magnetic resonance imaging datasets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Autism is one of the most common neurodevelopmental conditions, and it is characterized by restricted, repetitive behaviors and social difficulties that affect daily functioning. It is challenging to provide an early and accurate diagnosis due to the wide diversity of symptoms and the developmental changes that occur during childhood. We evaluate the feasibility of an explainable deep learning (DL) model using structural MRI (sMRI) to identify meaningful brain biomarkers relevant to autism in children and thus support its diagnosis. Approach: -weighted sMRI scans from children aged 9 to 11 years were obtained from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange database. A DL model was trained to differentiate between autistic and typically developing children. Model explainability was assessed using saliency maps to identify key brain regions contributing to classification. Model performance was evaluated across 20 folds and compared with traditional machine learning models trained with regional volumetric features extracted from the sMRI scans. Results: The model achieved a mean area under the receiver operating curve of 71.2%. The saliency maps highlighted brain regions that are known neuroanatomical and functional biomarkers associated with autism, such as the cuneus, pericalcarine, ventricles, lingual, vermal lobules, caudate, and thalamus. Conclusions: We show the potential of interpretable DL models trained on sMRI data to aid in autism diagnosis within a narrowly defined pediatric age group. Our findings contribute to the field of explainable artificial intelligence methods in neurodevelopmental research and may help in clinical decision-making for autism and other neurodevelopmental conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".