MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exploration of The Tpack Ability of Pre-Service Teacher Professional Education Students in The Perspective of Mastery of 21st Century Skills

2025· article· W4416047098 on OpenAlexaff
Julianto, Fatkur Rohman Kafrawi, Dhani Kristiandri, Muhammad Reza, Fitria Hidayati, Azizatul Munawwaroh

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of research and scientific innovation · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTeacher educationProfessional developmentData collectionPerspective (graphical)Presentation (obstetrics)TriangulationAction researchQuality (philosophy)Exploratory research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The government's action to improve the quality of education is carried out by initiating an independent learning curriculum. The 21st century skills are skills related to critical thinking, creative thinking, innovation, problem solving, communicative and collaborative. These abilities can be trained and developed in teaching and learning activities at school. To train and develop these abilities, a big role is needed from educators. Educators should master four competencies which include professional, personality, pedagogical and social competencies. The framework that can facilitate the four competencies, especially pedagogical and professional competencies, is Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK). Mastery of TPACK is very important to be owned by educators and prospective educators, including pre-service teacher professional education students of the UNESA PGSD Study Program, who are prospective elementary school teachers. The aim to be achieved in this study is to describe the Technological, pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) abilities of pre-service teacher professional education students of PGSD Study Program in the Perspective of Mastery of 21st Century Skills. The urgency of this research is as a reference for developing a professional elementary school teacher candidate program. This research is descriptive which is exploratory in nature to explore the TPACK knowledge of pre-service teacher professional education students who are prospective elementary school teachers. Data collection techniques were carried out using test and FGD methods. The data analysis technique uses the Miles and Huberman model. which includes data collection, data condensation, data presentation and conclusion drawing. Triangulation of data using triangulation of sources and techniques

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.857

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.424 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational journal of research and scientific innovationSame topicTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207