MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416049011 · doi:10.1093/noajnl/vdaf213.019

CNSM-05 CENTRAL NERVOUS TUMORS METASTASIS: CLINICAL EXPERIENCE IN THE SINGLE RADIOTHERAPY UNIT IN THE DR CONGO

2025· article· en· W4416049011 on OpenAlexaff
Vandrome Nakundi Kakonga, Mahomed Ilyas Yessoufou, Abou Dao, Urgel Kibhat, Stanislas Maseb’a Mwang Sulu, Thierry Muanza

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology Advances · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBrain Metastases and Treatment
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiation therapyBrain metastasisCancerPalliative careLung cancerSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaMetastasisCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Central Nervous system metastasis constitutes a healthcare challenge globally and the burden is especially pronounced in Low-, Middle- Income Countries (LMICs) where most of the cancer patients present with advanced disease. Radiotherapy is still a huge challenge in LMICs despite its role for local control. This study assesses the pattern of patients referred to a radiotherapy unit in the DRCongo for local control of brain metastasis the last two years. Methodology The REB approved retrospective study included 19 with CNS metastasis referred to the radiotherapy Unit of Nganda Center Hospital for palliative radiotherapy from June 2022 to December 2024. Clinical information was collected from the archive. Results The patients’age ranged from 38 to 74 years old, the median follow up of 138 days (51-235), female patients being more affected than male (74 vs 26 %), the majority had access either to MRI or CT scan imaging before treatment (58% and 39 % respectively). The most frequent histological subtype tumor was invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast in 68% (Hormone receptor positive IDC 40%, HER2-positive IDC 30% and Triple negative IDC 30%) followed by non-small cell lung cancer (15%) then small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma and melanoma. Radiotherapy (RT) was given as palliative treatment to the whole brain (74%), hippocampal sparing RT (11%) and stereotactic RT (15%); the mean duration of treatment was 12.28±6.27 days (95% CI of the Mean 9.16-15.39). The number of fractions ranged between 4.00-10.00 and dose per fraction between 3.00-5.00. The median progression free survival was 4 months (SE 0.6, 95% CI of the Median, 2.79-5.20). Conclusion This retrospective study shows the reality of CNS metastasis and the fundamental role of palliative radiotherapy for local control of the brain metastasis in the LMICs where the limited access to this technology is still noted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-Oncology AdvancesSame topicBrain Metastases and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207