Distributional regression for seasonal data: an application to river flows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Risk assessment in casualty insurance, such as flood risk, traditionally relies on extreme-value methods that emphasizes rare events. These approaches are well-suited for characterizing tail risk, but do not capture the broader dynamics of environmental variables such as moderate or frequent loss events. To complement these methods, we propose a modelling framework for estimating the full (daily) distribution of environmental variables as a function of time, that is a distributional version of typical climatological summary statistics, thereby incorporating both seasonal variation and gradual long-term changes. Aside from the time trend, to capture seasonal variation our approach simultaneously estimates the distribution for each instant of the seasonal cycle, without explicitly modelling the temporal dependence present in the data. To do so, we adopt a framework inspired by GAMLSS (Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape), where the parameters of the distribution vary over the seasonal cycle as a function of explanatory variables depending only on the time of year, and not on the past values of the process under study. Ignoring the temporal dependence in the seasonal variation greatly simplifies the modelling but poses inference challenges that we clarify and overcome. We apply our framework to daily river flow data from three hydrometric stations along the Fraser River in British Columbia, Canada, and analyse the flood of the Fraser River in early winter of 2021.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.036 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".