MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416059317 · doi:10.1190/geo-2025-0239

High-order pseudo-random binary signals for frequency domain electromagnetic explorations

2025· article· en· W4416059317 on OpenAlexaff
Yang Yang, Changyu Zhou, Jishan He, Heng Zhang, Dongxu Ji

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsFuture Earth
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperposition principleWaveformSIGNAL (programming language)Binary numberParticle swarm optimizationEnergy (signal processing)Range (aeronautics)Frequency domain

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT In the field of frequency-domain electromagnetic (EM) exploration with artificial sources, various signals were employed. However, these signals often failed to encompass all relevant frequencies of interest (or effective frequencies), necessitated signal replacements during operations, which significantly affected fieldwork efficiency. To address this issue, a novel method for generating pseudo-random binary signals was proposed, which included a wide range of frequency components. With this method, the frequency requirements for most frequency-domain EM exploration projects were met using only one waveform that is specially designed for the project. Consequently, the need for signal replacement during operations was eliminated, leading to a great improvement in the efficiency of field work. The generation method was based on waveform superposition and hard clipping, combined with unit integration. To improve the efficiency of signal generation, we adopted a specifically modified multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm. To ensure the practical applicability of the generated signals, the optimization was designed to target two key properties: energy concentration and uniformity of the effective frequency spectrum. This approach enabled the rapid generation of signals that met engineering requirements in only a few minutes. This type of signal has been successfully applied in multiple field exploration projects, and has delivered excellent results, verifying its effectiveness in improving both work efficiency and anti-interference capability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.767
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207