MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416061600 · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.70198

Hormones reflect the impacts of reproductive rest on subsequent pregnancy in a marine predator

2025· article· en· W4416061600 on OpenAlexaff
Amy L. Kirkham, Michelle R. Shero, Robert McCorkell, Donald L. Thompson, Roxanne S. Beltran, Shannon Atkinson, Jennifer M. Burns

Bibliographic record

VenueFunctional Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsThompson Rivers UniversityUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersDivision of Ocean SciencesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsReproductionPregnancySemelparity and iteroparitySeasonal breederHormoneGestationReproductive successLuteinizing hormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract After reaching sexual maturity, iteroparous female vertebrates may intermittently skip producing offspring, effectively taking a year of reproductive rest. This may confer benefits to lifetime fitness by enhancing future reproductive success. To identify links between reproductive rest and subsequent reproductive outcomes, the physiological status of female Weddell seals ( Leptonychotes weddellii ) that skipped pupping in the current year (skip females, n = 45) and seals that gave birth (postpartum females, n = 87) was compared. Serum concentrations of hormones (progesterone, oestrogen, luteinizing hormone, follicle‐stimulating hormone, prolactin, thyroxine [T 4 ] and cortisol) were measured during the pupping period, breeding period and early gestation. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to image ovaries and detect early pregnancies. Range‐wide censuses conducted the next year determined if females successfully gave birth. Skip females ovulated up to 4 weeks earlier than postpartum seals and gave birth earlier the following year. Postpartum seals that gave birth late in the pupping season ovulated at fewer days postpartum than seals that gave birth early and had the lowest rates of pregnancy and successful birth. Late‐birthing females were therefore most likely to skip reproduction the following year, likely shifting subsequent reproductive timing forward. Skip females had higher serum concentrations of T 4 , oestrogen and progesterone than postpartum females in both breeding and early gestation periods, plus lower serum cortisol concentrations during early gestation. Serum T 4 concentrations were positively correlated with higher likelihoods that seals were pregnant and would successfully give birth. Postpartum females had higher serum prolactin concentrations than skip females in the pupping and breeding periods. However, prolactin declined across the summer in all animals, likely reflecting a seasonal transition from a breeding to a non‐breeding physiological state. This study revealed that physiological differences between skip and postpartum female Weddell seals persisted long after pupping and into the next reproductive cycle. Findings on trade‐offs between current and future reproduction in a polar pinniped suggest that reproductive rest allows birth timing to advance the next season, helping improve reproductive fitness and maintaining a tight temporal window for birth in the Antarctic marine environment. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFunctional EcologySame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207