MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spectroscopic investigation of states in 136Ba via the 137Ba(3He, α) reaction

2025· article· en· W4416065737 on OpenAlexaff
M. Kamil, S. Triambak, G. C. Ball, V. Bildstein, C. Burbadge, A. Diaz Varela, T. Faestermann, P. E. Garrett, R. Hertenberger, K. G. Leach, F. Ghazi Moradi, N. J. Mukwevho, B. Rebeiro, M. Scheck, H.-F. Wirth

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Physics A · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphTRIUMF
FundersNational Research Foundation
KeywordsQuenching (fluorescence)NeutronNuclear reactionSpectroscopyDouble beta decayGamma spectroscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 137 Ba( 3 He, α ) neutron removal reaction was used to investigate nuclear states in 136 Ba, relevant for the neutrinoless double beta decay (0 νββ ) of 136 Xe. Preliminary values of spectroscopic factors are reported. A quenching of the measured cross sections is observed, which appears to be consistent with previous results from ( e, e ′ p ) and other single-nucleon transfer reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Physics ASame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207