MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416069678 · doi:10.4324/9780203138786-12

Giorgio Vasari, Le Vite De' Più Eccellenti Pittori, Scultori E Architettori [The Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors and Architects] (1550 and 1568)

2013· book-chapter· en· W4416069678 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ben Thomas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeSubject (documents)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The full Italian text of both editions of Vasari's Lives can be found in Paola Barocchi and Rosanna Bettarini (eds), Le Vite de’ più eccellenti pittori, scultori e architetti nelle redazioni del 1550 e del 1568, 6 vols, Florence: Sansoni, 1966–87. There are numerous selections from the Lives in English translation. The one cited here is the 4 volume Everyman edition (London and Toronto: Dent, 1927) translated by A. B. Hinds – one of the more complete translations, although omitting the dedicatory letters, ‘Proemio’ and technical introduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRenaissance and Early Modern StudiesFrench-language works237,207