MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416073471 · doi:10.2147/nss.s521723

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Positional Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Chinese Children: A Retrospective Study

2025· article· en· W4416073471 on OpenAlex
Awk Tang, Siyu Dai, Chun Ting Au, Michelle Yu, Albert Martin Li, Kate Ching Ching Chan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNature and Science of Sleep · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObstructive sleep apneaRetrospective cohort studyNatural historyDiseaseSleep apneaFamily historyEpidemiologyLongitudinal study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To investigate the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) in Chinese children. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of children aged 4-17 years with OSA from local referrals for sleep-disordered breathing. Children who underwent diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) with at least 30 minutes of total sleep time in both supine and non-supine sleep were included. Standardized sleep questionnaires, Sleepiness Scales, Child Behavior Checklist and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were completed. OSA was defined as obstructive apnea-hypopnea index (OAHI) ≥1/h. POSA was defined as OAHI in the supine position ≥ two times the OAHI in the non-supine position. Results: 314 children (mean age: 10.88±3.22 years; male: 70%) with OSA were analyzed, of whom 147 (46.8%) had moderate/severe OSA (OAHI≥5). Prevalence of POSA was 58% within our cohort and 51% among those with moderate/severe OSA. Children with POSA were older (10.8±3.3 years vs 9.1±2.6 years; p<0.001), had milder disease [OAHI 4.12 (2.14-8.62) events/h vs 6.16 events/h); p=0.026] and had smaller tonsillar size (55% vs 72%; p=0.011). By logistic regression, POSA was associated with older age (OR 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.32; p<0.001) and lower OAHI (B-0.036; SE 0.011; OR 0.964; 95% CI 0.943-0.986; p=0.001). Conclusion: POSA is a prevalent phenotype seen in children, demonstrating strong associations with older age, more mature pubertal development, smaller tonsillar size and milder disease severity. Future studies should also delineate the natural history and longitudinal stability of this subtype over time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it