MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416074288 · doi:10.32628/ijsrset2513860

Fire Detection Using Deep Learning

2025· article· W4416074288 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Scientific Research in Science Engineering and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeep learningFire detectionConvolutional neural networkFire alarm systemObject detectionArtificial neural networkALARM

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This project titled Fire Detection Using Deep Learning is an intelligent and fully automated computer vision-based system designed to detect fire in real time with high accuracy. The system analyzes live video streams or images to identify fire visually using deep learning and Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques. Traditional fire detection systems such as smoke and heat sensors often suffer from delayed detection, limited coverage, and high false alarm rates. To overcome these limitations, the proposed system uses a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model capable of recognizing fire patterns based on color, texture, and motion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.714
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0120.009
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it