Template-based respiratory monitoring and tidal volume estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vision-based monitoring has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional contact-based solutions in intensive care units. Though existing studies have shown its potential in respiratory monitoring, this approach is still in its early stages. For instance, the impact of the body region to be monitored has rarely been investigated, especially in respiratory volume estimation. Furthermore, important clinical constraints including body motion and occlusion artifacts are usually neglected for simplification. These drawbacks compromise the practicality of vision based respiratory monitoring in clinical uses. In this re-search, we propose a novel approach to modeling the torso region, which is instrumental in accurate respirator monitoring and volume estimation. First, the patient's body surface is captured using a Kinect camera. The body surface is then aligned and registered with a pre-defined human template, allowing consistent modeling and segmentation of the respiration-relevant region. Finally, an efficient yet accurate volume computation algorithm is initiated for volume monitoring and respiratory parameter extraction. The effectiveness of our proposed approach is validated on a group of voluntary subjects by comparing it with gold standard spirometry as well as with annotation by experts. Overall, the system reaches an accuracy of over 90% for tidal volume estimation and 95% for respiratory rate estimation without requiring patient-specific calibration data, thus illustrating its effectiveness and robustness for ICU respiratory monitoring.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".