MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416079386 · doi:10.14393/ree-v40n2a2025-77734

Sectoral Impact Assessment of the Export Financing Program – PROEX

2025· article· W4416079386 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rodrigo Duarte Dourado

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomia Ensaios · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLogistics and Infrastructure Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of ReadingAustralian GovernmentÉcole nationale d'administration publique
KeywordsTreasuryExportationShock (circulatory)AttractivenessGovernment (linguistics)Economic impact analysisExport performanceGoods and servicesEconometric model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Export Financing Program (PROEX) is a federal government instrument designed to support Brazilin export of goods and services through two modalities: National Treasury Financing and Interest Rate Support. This study evaluates the impact of PROEX on Brazilian exports between 2010 and 2021, adopting a novel approach that examines different sectors of the Brazilian export industry. The net effect of PROEX on each sector’s overall export capacity was analyzed, accounting for changes in firms’ market power within each sector. To address unobservable endogenous factors affecting PROEX's performance, an exogenous term was developed to reflect the economic attractiveness of Brazil's 20 main export markets. The econometric analysis indicates that a 10% increase in exports PROEX-supported exports, combined with a proportional demand shock in the destination countries, leads to an average increase of 21.3% in Brazilian sectoral exports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomia EnsaiosSame topicLogistics and Infrastructure AnalysisFrench-language works237,207