MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416084993 · doi:10.25251/0j9fht97

Updated Integrated Safety Analysis of Ritlecitinib Up to ~5 Years in Patients With Alopecia Areata From the ALLEGRO Clinical Trial Program

2025· article· W4416084993 on OpenAlexaff
Maryanne M. Senna, Sameh Hanna, Rie Ueki, Xingqi Zhang, Crystal Aguh, Bianca Maria Piraccini, Edward Nagy, Alexandre Lejeune, Mojgan Sadrarhami, Simon Chen, Robert Wołk

Bibliographic record

VenueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicHair Growth and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlopecia areataAdverse effectIncidence (geometry)Clinical trialSafety profilePooled analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.367
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSKIN The Journal of Cutaneous MedicineSame topicHair Growth and DisordersFrench-language works237,207