Financing Indigenous Entrepreneurship in Yukon: Challenges and Opportunities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the evolving landscape of financing resources available to Canadian Indigenous entrepreneurs, with a particular emphasis on Yukon First Nations engaged in developing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Drawing on a historical overview, the study highlights the economic transformations that followed colonial contact, which disrupted traditional subsistence and redistributive economies and contributed to longstanding structural barriers in accessing capital. These barriers include limited collateral, restricted access to mainstream financial networks, and systemic inequities in lending practices. At the same time, Indigenous entrepreneurial activities in the Yukon are shaped by distinctive value orientations that prioritize community well-being, cultural continuity, and sustainability alongside economic growth. The analysis further explores how a range of financing mechanisms has emerged to respond to these unique needs. These include partnerships between First Nations governments and financial institutions, Indigenous-controlled development corporations, community-based lending programs, and the increasing presence of supportive institutions such as the First Nations Bank of Canada and the Yukon First Nations Chamber of Commerce. By mapping the interplay between mainstream and Indigenous financial resources, the paper outlines both the progress made in creating culturally relevant financing pathways and the challenges that persist in achieving equitable access to entrepreneurial capital. Ultimately, this study underscores the importance of innovative financing models that respect Indigenous values, strengthen economic sovereignty, and contribute to the long-term prosperity of Yukon First Nations communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".