MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416088091 · doi:10.3897/zookeys.1259.164450

A Japan-focused review of East Asian Acicnemis Fairmaire, 1849 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) reveals cryptic diversity in a well-studied region

2025· review· en· W4416088091 on OpenAlexafffund
Jake H. Lewis, Hiroaki Kojima, Erin O. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueZooKeys · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicColeoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection AgencyUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Museum of Nature
KeywordsSynonym (taxonomy)DNA barcodingEast AsiaMainlandSpecies complexIdentification (biology)Key (lock)Diversity (politics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The East Asian species of Acicnemis Fairmaire, 1849 (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Molytinae) are reviewed using a combination of traditional morphological approaches (microscopy, dissections) and DNA barcoding. Three new species, A. cryptica Lewis & Kojima, sp. nov. , A. koguma Lewis & Kojima, sp. nov. and A. squamata Lewis & Kojima, sp. nov. are described from mainland Japan. The former two species are cryptic and sister to more widespread, previously described taxa. Based on examination of name-bearing type material and morphological considerations Acicnemis cruciata Kleine, 1924 syn. nov. is a junior subjective synonym of Acicnemis postica Hubenthal, 1919, Acicnemis yakushimana Morimoto & Miyakawa, 1995 syn. nov. is a junior subjective synonym of A. dividicincta Morimoto & Miyakawa, 1995, and Acicnemis dorsonigrita Voss, 1941 syn. nov. is a junior subjective synonym of Acicnemis palliata Pascoe, 1872. Lectotypes are designated for Acicnemis albofasciata (Ter-Minasian, 1953), A. laeta Hubenthal, 1919, A. postica Hubenthal, 1919 and A. sauteri Hubenthal, 1919. Important morphological characters used in Acicnemis species identification are reviewed and a key to the East Asian species is provided. DNA (CO1) barcoding is used to supplement our morphology-based species hypothesis, and the first published barcodes for most species covered here are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.975

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZooKeysSame topicColeoptera Taxonomy and DistributionFrench-language works237,207