MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416088851 · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2025.08.020

The ANTICIPATE-NASH Models Stratify Better the Risk of Clinical Events Than Histology in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease

2025· article· en· W4416088851 on OpenAlexaff
Laia Aceituno, Juan Bañares, Mònica Pons, Jesús Rivera‐Esteban, Clara Sabiote, Calogero Cammà, Giacinta Ciancimino, Grazia Pennisi, Adele Tulone, Mang Ma, Xiangyu Liu, Timothy R. Watkins, Andrew N. Billin, Salvatore Petta, Juan M. Pericàs, Juan G. Abraldeṣ, Joan Genescà

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersEuropean Social FundEuropean Regional Development FundInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
KeywordsCirrhosisSteatosisChronic liver diseaseHistologyClinical trialRisk stratificationDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The reference for risk stratification and clinical trial selection of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) patients is fibrosis degree by histology. The noninvasive ANTICIPATE-NASH models have been validated for risk prediction of clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and liver-related events (LRE). We assessed whether these models provide better risk stratification of events than histology. METHODS: A multicenter cohort 1, including 699 biopsy specimen-proven F3-F4 patients with MASLD was evaluated. The end point was LRE (hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, transplantation, or liver-related death). We assessed (Cox regression) whether histology provided added value to ANTICIPATE-NASH and whether model predictions differed in F3/F4 patients. Results were validated in cohort 2 (1396 F3-F4 patients) from 4 clinical trials using the clinical regulatory end point. RESULTS: In cohort 1, F3 and F4 were equally distributed. There were 56 LREs (8.0%) during follow-up, concentrated in F4 (51 LREs). The ANTICIPATE-NASH model showed excellent discrimination (C statistic, 0.93) for LRE, higher than histology (C statistic, 0.67). Model calibration was excellent. Adding histology did not improve model prediction. Thresholds of ANTICIPATE-NASH above which F3 patients developed LREs and below which F4 patients did not were identified. Results were reproduced in cohort 2 with the regulatory end point, with higher model discrimination (C statistic, 0.84) compared with histology (C statistic, 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: In MASLD patients with F3/F4, the noninvasive ANTICIPATE-NASH models provide better risk stratification of clinical events than histologic classification. These models could be very useful for clinical trials by selecting patients at risk of clinical events and patients with higher chances of observed cirrhosis regression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterologySame topicLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207