MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416096558 · doi:10.1038/s43247-025-02868-z

Impact-generated magnetite in Chang’e-5 soil as a potential recorder of lunar magnetism

2025· article· en· W4416096558 on OpenAlexafffund
Jinhua Li, Chaoqun Zhang, Chen Li, Yi Chen, Qinghua Zhang, Qianqian Lan, Yuqin Wang, Weiwei Wu, Jian Wang, Zheng Gong, Xu Tang, Lixin Gu, ShiQi Cheng, Peiyu Liu, Jiawei Liu, Qiuli Li, Lin Gu, Gang Li, Yang Li, Rafal E. Dunin‐Borkowski, Andrew P. Roberts, Yongxin Pan

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Earth & Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)University of Saskatchewan
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Light Source
KeywordsMagnetitePentlanditeRock magnetismRemanenceMagnetismMineral redox bufferMagnetometerPyrrhotitePigeonite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Magnetite is a principal paleomagnetic recorder on Earth, but lunar magnetism is thought to be dominated by metallic iron and Fe-Ni alloys, with magnetite rare and typically sub-micrometer within troilite. We identify nanometer- to micrometer-scale magnetite in pentlandite-troilite assemblages from a Chang’e-5 regolith breccia. Magnetite occurs at and within pentlandite, locally enclosing pentlandite nanoinclusions, implying a formation pathway distinct from troilite-hosted occurrences. Textures and compositions indicate sequential crystallization from an impact-generated Fe-Ni-S-O melt: rapid pentlandite growth along troilite margins followed by magnetite nucleation at sulfide-silicate interfaces. The lunar low oxygen fugacity stabilizes Fe 2+ -enriched magnetite, unlike terrestrial analogues. High crystallinity and single-domain to single-vortex states indicate strong remanence stability, making these grains reliable recorders of the contemporaneous lunar magnetic fields. These results broaden the inventory of lunar magnetic carriers, demonstrate impact-driven magnetite formation under lunar redox conditions, and motivate use of magnetite to refine the Moon’s magnetic history.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications Earth & EnvironmentSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207