MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416096815 · doi:10.5194/bg-22-6651-2025

Fire activity in the northern Arctic tundra now exceeds late Holocene levels, driven by increasing dryness and shrub expansion

2025· article· en· W4416096815 on OpenAlexaff
Angelica Feurdean, Randy Fulweber, Andrei‐Cosmin Diaconu, Graeme T. Swindles, Mariusz Gałka

Bibliographic record

VenueBiogeosciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNarodowym Centrum NaukiDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsTundraPeatPermafrostArcticFire regimeVegetation (pathology)Climate changeEcosystemArctic ecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Tundra ecosystems are characterized by small, rare and infrequent fires due to cold, often waterlogged conditions, and limited biomass. However, ongoing climate warming and drying in northern soils and peatlands are contributing to increasingly frequent and extensive wildfires. To place recent fire regimes in the context of long-term variability and to better understand interactions between fire, moisture, and vegetation, we reconstructed wildfire history over the past 3000 years using a network of charcoal, vegetation, and hydrological records in combination with satellite-derived fire datasets from northern Arctic Alaska peatlands. The composite charcoal record shows minimal fire activity from ∼ 1000 BCE to 1000 CE, followed by a modest increase between 1000 and 1200 CE, and then a renewed decline. This long-term pattern shifted abruptly after 1900 CE, reaching its maximum between 1950 and 2015 CE, when fire activity exceeded any levels observed in the preceding three millennia. Individual charcoal records show a spatially heterogeneous pattern in fire occurrence before 1950 CE, and a more homogeneous one thereafter. Our findings suggest that the deepening of water tables and peatland drying associated with permafrost thaw have facilitated woody encroachment, especially by more flammable Ericaceous shrubs. These vegetation changes have increased fuel availability and flammability, ultimately driving the recent surge in wildfire activity, highlighting the growing vulnerability of Arctic tundra ecosystems to fire. We also found that the charcoal source area of our tundra fire reconstruction encompasses broader landscapes over tens of kilometres. Our study emphasizes the significance of long-term, multidisciplinary research in documenting moisture–vegetation–fire feedbacks that influence tundra fire regimes. Ultimately, this long-term fire dynamic study provides critical context for evaluating recent changes and incorporating tundra peatland fire risk into global climate mitigation strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiogeosciencesSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207