Early prediction of final body weight in Hanwoo steers using machine and deep learning models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Accurate early prediction of final body weight (BW) is essential for optimizing feeding strategies and slaughter planning in beef cattle production. This study compared the performance of three machine learning models (k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and eXtreme Gradient Boosting) and one deep learning model (long short-term memory [LSTM]) to forecast the final BW of Hanwoo steers at various time points prior to slaughter. METHODS: A total of 196 Hanwoo steers (7 to 31 months of age) from a commercial farm were utilized. Input data included monthly BW and feed nutrient intake (crude protein, ether extract, neutral detergent fiber, and total digestible nutrients) across three growth stages. Six input configurations (I1-I6) were designed to predict the final BW at 17, 13, 9, 6, 3, and 1 month(s) before slaughter, with a target age of 31 months. The machine and deep learning models were assessed by five-fold cross-validation (training set) and a test set and evaluated via the coefficient of determination (R²) and root mean squared error (RMSE). RESULTS: Among the tested models, the LSTM achieved the highest prediction accuracy across all the configurations. The performance of the LSTM improved as the prediction point approached the target slaughter age: I1 (R² = 0.60, RMSE = 52.80), I2 (0.72, 45.40), I3 (0.76, 40.92), I4 (0.83, 35.84), I5 (0.90, 33.12), and I6 (0.97, 22.62). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated that LSTM effectively captured temporal dependencies in sequential data, enabling more accurate BW forecasting under commercial conditions. While I6 achieved the highest prediction accuracy, the 3-6 month predictions (I4 and I5) demonstrated reasonably high accuracy, which could provide a practical timeframe for farm-level management and planning. This approach could be used in evidencebased decision-making in Hanwoo production by providing reliable predictions well before slaughter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".