MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416099739 · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae0a35

THYME. XIII. Two Young Neptunes Orbiting a 75 Myr Star in the Alpha Persei Cluster

2025· article· en· W4416099739 on OpenAlexafffund
Anne Dattilo, Andrew Vanderburg, Madyson G. Barber, Andrew W. Mann, Ronan Kerr, Adam L. Kraus, Joseph R. Livesey, Cristilyn N. Watkins, Karen A. Collins, Juliana García‐Mejía, Patrick Tamburo, Juliette Becker, Annelies Mortier, T. G. Wilson, Nicholas Scarsdale, Emily A. Gilbert, Alex S. Polanski, Steve B. Howell, Ian J. M. Crossfield, Allyson Bieryla, David R. Ciardi, Thomas Barclay, David Charbonneau, David W. Latham, Joseph M. Akana Murphy, Elisabeth Newton, Bob Massey, Richard P. Schwarz, Chris Stockdale, Francis P. Wilkin, Roberto Zambelli

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience Mission DirectorateAmes Research CenterAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCalifornia Institute of TechnologyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversity of TorontoJet Propulsion LaboratoryUK Research and InnovationMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia, Inovações e ComunicaçõesNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPlanetRADIUSOrbital periodPlanetary systemOrbit (dynamics)Orbital decaySuper-EarthExoplanetOrbital elementsStar (game theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Young planets with mass measurements are particularly valuable in studying atmospheric mass-loss processes, but these planets are rare and their masses difficult to measure due to stellar activity. We report the discovery of a planetary system around TOI-6109, a young, 75 Myr-old Sun-like star in the Alpha Persei cluster. It hosts at least two transiting Neptune-like planets within 10 day orbital periods. Using three TESS sectors, 30 CHEOPS orbits, and photometric follow-up observations from the ground, we confirm the signals of the two planets. TOI-6109 b has an orbital period of P = 5.690 4 − 0.0004 + 0.0004 days and a radius of R = 4.8 7 − 0.12 + 0.16 R ⊕ . The outer planet, TOI-6109 c has an orbital period of P = 8.538 8 − 0.0005 + 0.0006 days and a radius of R = 4.8 3 − 0.06 + 0.07 R ⊕ . These planets orbit just outside a 3:2 mean motion resonance. The near-resonant configuration presents the opportunity to measure the planet’s mass via TTV measurements and to bypass difficult RV measurements. Measuring the masses of the planets in this system will allow us to test theoretical models of atmospheric mass loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6080.340

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical Journal→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→