MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416101566 · doi:10.5539/jel.v15n2p45

Development of Non-Formal Education Program Enhancing Media Literacy for Families

2025· article· W4416101566 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Veerasak Khobkhet, Choosak Ueangchokchai, Walainart Meepan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education and Learning · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Digital Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMisinformationMedia literacyLiteracyThematic analysisInformation literacyContent analysisQualitative researchSocial media

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Media literacy has become an essential skill for all age groups in today’s complex digital environment. This study aimed to development of non-formal education program enhancing media literacy for families, based on a qualitative case study analysis in Thailand. Eight diverse families were selected and interviewed in-depth to examinevtheir media usage behaviors, experiences with misinformation or online scams, and family communication patterns regarding media. Thematic analysis of the interview data revealed several key factors contributing to media literacy at both personal and family levels. These included overreliance on a single familiar medium, lack of critical analysis and verification of information, overtrust in media content and endorsements, and insufficient communication within the family about media-related issues. Many family members who fell victim to media scams admitted that they did not cross-check information or discuss decisions with others beforehand. Based on these insights, a non-formal education program for families was designed. The program emphasizes collaborative learning among family members, covering core media literacy skills of access, analysis, and evaluation of media content. It consists of interactive learning activities that engage both parents and children in analyzing media messages, sharing experiences, and practicing safe media habits. The findings highlight that empowering families with media literacy and encouraging open intra-family communication can build a first line of defense against misinformation and fraud. The paper discusses how the family-based program can be implemented and offers recommendations for educators and policymakers to support and sustain media literacy education in the family context. All in all, this research contributes a practical family-focused approach to strengthening media literacy, which is critical for safe and informed media consumption in the digital age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education and LearningSame topicChild Development and Digital TechnologyFrench-language works237,207