MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416102986 · doi:10.1016/j.afres.2025.101507

Membrane fractionation improved the multifunctional properties of fava bean protein hydrolysate

2025· article· en· W4416102986 on OpenAlexafffund
Timilehin David Oluwajuyitan, Rotimi E. Aluko

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Food Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsHydrolysateAmino acidPeptideFractionationLinoleic acidDPPHUltrafiltration (renal)Membrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Essential and hydrophobic amino acids were highest in the <1 kDa peptide fraction. • Membrane fractionation improved the DPPH and superoxide radical scavenging activities. • Inhibitions of α-amylase and pancreatic lipase were inversely related to peptide size. • The <1 kDa peptide fraction had the strongest inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme. In this study, the effects of membrane ultrafiltration and peptide size on the amino acid profile and in vitro bioactive properties of fava bean pepsin protein hydrolysate (FBPH) were determined. FBPH was fractionated sequentially using regenerated cellulose membranes with molecular weight cut-offs of <1 kDa, 1–3 kDa, 3–5 kDa, 5–10 kDa, and >10 kDa to elucidate structure-function relationships among peptide fractions. Results obtained showed that membrane fractionation markedly enhanced amino acid profile with the <1 kDa exhibiting significantly ( p < 0.05) higher contents of essential amino acids (47.38 %), branched chain amino acids (23.87 %), hydrophobic amino acids (50.68 %), aromatic amino acids (13.65 %), and arginine to lysine ratio (1.65) in comparison to other peptide fractions (35.68–43.60 %; 13.37–21.16 %; 31.18–45.91; 6.99–11.04 %; and 1.44–1.49, respectively) and the unfractionated hydrolysate - FBPH (39.49 %; 17.44 %; 38.71 %; 9.22 % and 1.46, respectively). Also, membrane fractionation improved the DPPH and superoxide radical scavenging activities as well as inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation of the peptide fractions when compared to the FBPH. The α-amylase, pancreatic lipase and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activities of the membrane fractions demonstrated increases that corresponded with decreases in the molecular weight of the peptide fractions. However, the <1 kDa fraction had the strongest ( p < 0.05) inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme while FBPH inhibited arginase activity the most. In conclusion, membrane ultrafiltration of pepsin-hydrolyzed fava bean protein generated active peptides with the <1 kDa sizes being the most active. Therefore, pepsin-hydrolyzed fava bean protein and its membrane fractions could be useful ingredients to formulate functional foods against oxidative stress and associated degenerative diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Food ResearchSame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207