MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416104672 · doi:10.1080/03054985.2025.2573268

Reconceptualising early childhood education in Nigeria: a praxis for policy and research

2025· article· en· W4416104672 on OpenAlexaff
Iyanuoluwa Emmanuel Olalowo, Ikeoluwapo Baruwa, Olawumi Helen Olalowo, Oluwatosin F. Aluko

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford Review of Education · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Education and Politics
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPraxisEarly childhood educationEarly childhoodQualitative researchPreschool educationChild developmentEducational researchPublic policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconceptualising early childhood care and education enables critical thinking about policies, practices, curriculum planning, policy formulation, implementation, care, the development of young children, and research with children. This new ideology differs significantly from previous perceptions of childhood education, which have been both a programme of study and a practitioner-provided service, especially in developing countries influenced by Western education practices. This paper highlights paradigm shifts and new perspectives on childhood education, particularly in Nigeria. We examine how scholars have reconceptualised early childhood education (ECE) policy and research and how this provides insights into making education primarily liberatory and child-centred, rather than transactional, in Nigeria. We advocate the importance of recognising children as active participants in research and policy formulation and emphasise the role of stakeholders, including government agencies, educators, researchers, and families, in shaping a more inclusive ECE system in Nigeria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.467
Teacher spread0.427 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford Review of EducationSame topicAfrican Education and PoliticsFrench-language works237,207