TRADITIONAL IDEOLOGICAL AND ARTISTIC COMPONENTS IN MODERN ARCHITECTURE OF CHINA. THE COMPARATIVE APPROACH
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is devoted to the problem of approaches to the formation of a methodology for studying the formation of continuity of images in Chinese architecture at the end of the 20th - first quarter of the 21st century. It is shown that the components of traditional architecture, taken for granted in a certain period, grow and evolve, and with them, architecture also changes in accordance with changes in worldview, lifestyle and social structure. A comparative analysis of significant buildings indicates that contemporary Chinese architecture remains true to its civilisational imperative. Architects keep the system of traditional images, only change the design instructions, use modern construction materials. It is argued that architects embody Chinese culture and worldview in their projects, thereby preserving a unified mental field.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it