Evaluating Homework Adherence in Studies of Mindfulness Based Cognitive Therapy for Female Sexual Dysfunction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Homework is a key factor in the effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions, yet there is no standardized method for measuring homework adherence, particularly in interventions targeting female sexual dysfunction (FSD). This study aimed to describe current methods used to assess homework adherence in research on mindfulness-based interventions for FSD. A descriptive secondary analysis was conducted using data from three randomized clinical trials, totaling 197 women. The analysis focused on the frequency and duration of formal and informal mindfulness practices, assessed immediately post-treatment and at follow-up (6-12 months). Results indicated diverse and inconsistent methods to evaluate homework completion, with a general decline in adherence over time. Participants showed moderate engagement, with formal practices declining more sharply than informal ones and brief exercises showing marked reductions in frequency. These findings highlight the need for consistent monitoring of homework adherence to ensure treatment fidelity and to optimize outcomes. Strengths include the longitudinal approach and methodological recommendations. Limitations involve the use of unvalidated and variable measurement tools. In conclusion, this research underscores the urgent need for psychometrically validated instruments to assess homework adherence in mindfulness-based interventions for FSD and provides practical guidance for researchers and clinicians.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".