MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416110486 · doi:10.1039/d5ta06486d

Come for predictions, stay for complexity: synthesis and experimental probing of ionic conductivity in Li <sub>9</sub> B <sub>19</sub> S <sub>33</sub>

2025· article· en· W4416110486 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Richeal Oppong, Scott A. Southern, D. Christopher Martin, Isabella Freebairn, Arka Sarkar, Yao Abusa, Gayatri Viswanathan, Frédéric A. Perras, Steve W. Martin, Kirill Kovnir

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Materials Chemistry A · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBasic Energy SciencesDivision of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport SystemsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Science FoundationIowa State UniversityU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceCanadian Light Source
KeywordsIonic conductivityIonic bondingConductivityLithium (medication)Conductor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicted superior Li-ion ionic conductor Li 9 B 19 S 33 was experimentally synthesized and characterized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Materials Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207