Individual trajectories for recovery of neocortical activity in disorders of consciousness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evolution from disturbed brain activity to physiological brain rhythms can precede recovery in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC). Accordingly, intriguing questions arise: What are the pathophysiological factors associated to disrupted brain rhythms in patients with DoC, and are there potential pathways for individual patients with DoC to return to normal brain rhythms? We addressed these questions at the individual subject level using biophysical simulations based on electroencephalography (EEG). The main findings are that unconscious patients exhibit a loss of excitatory corticothalamic synaptic strength. Synaptic plasticity in this excitatory corticothalamic circuitry facilitates the return of physiological brain rhythms, characterized by the reappearance of spectral peaks and flattening of the aperiodic (1/f) component of the power spectrum, in the selection of patients with DoC, particularly in those who are minimally conscious. The extent to which this occurred was correlated with cerebral glucose uptake. The current findings emphasize the importance of excitatory thalamocortical activity in reestablishing normal brain rhythms after brain injury and show that biophysical modelling of the corticothalamic circuitry could help select patients who might be potentially receptive to treatment and undergo plasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".