MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416114018 · doi:10.1109/rbme.2025.3624970

Transcranial Focused Ultrasound: A Transformative Tool for Intracranial Ablation, Drug Delivery, and Neuromodulation

2025· article· en· W4416114018 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin Davidson, Franziska A. Schmidt, Oliver Bichsel, Mohammad Mehdi Hajiabadi, Andrés M. Lozano

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuromodulationTranscranial direct-current stimulationTranscranial magnetic stimulationTransformative learningDeep brain stimulationBrain stimulationFocused ultrasoundStepping stone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is an emerging neuromodulation and therapeutic technology offering noninvasive, submillimeter precision for targeting deep brain structures. Unlike transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial electric stimulation (tES), which are limited by depth-focality tradeoffs, or deep brain stimulation (DBS), which is invasive and costly, tFUS enables precise modulation with minimal risk. Its applications include ablation for movement and psychiatric disorders, blood-brain barrier opening (BBBO) for drug delivery in neuro-oncology and neurodegeneration, and neuromodulation for circuit-based interventions in addiction, mood/anxiety disorders, and chronic pain. Advances in phased-array transducers, holographic focusing, and real-time imaging continue to refine its accuracy and safety. Ongoing research explores closed-loop systems and wearable devices to expand clinical accessibility. This review outlines the physics, current applications, and future directions of tFUS, positioning it as a transformative tool in personalized neuromodulation and neurotherapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Reviews in Biomedical EngineeringSame topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207