MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416114736 · doi:10.1039/d5se01324k

Machine learning prediction on adsorption capacities of steam methane reforming off-gas in silica gels

2025· article· en· W4416114736 on OpenAlexaff
Tianqi Yang, Wei Dong, Hao Luo, Ben Chen, Yonghua Cai, Chenglong Li, Xuefang Li, Richard Chahine, Jinsheng Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Energy & Fuels · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdsorption and Cooling Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hubei ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSteam reformingAdsorptionMethaneArtificial neural networkMethane reformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep neural networks have achieved excellent performance in predicting the adsorption capacity of steam methane reforming gas on silica gel, thereby reducing experimental costs and improving the prediction efficiency of adsorption isotherms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.828

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable Energy & FuelsSame topicAdsorption and Cooling SystemsFrench-language works237,207