Prediction of Stature From Percutaneous Anthropometric Dimensions of the Femur and Tibia Among Adult Nigerians
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Estimating stature, sex, ancestry, and age is central to forensic anthropological profiling, underpinning human identification in medico-legal contexts and mass-casualty events. Skeletal analysis informs these components. Although widely established in developed settings, Nigeria and many developing countries lack robust forensic anthropometric datasets despite rising disaster rates. This study sought to derive population‑specific regression equations to estimate stature from percutaneous femoral and tibial measurements in Nigerians. Regression analysis has proven to be the most straightforward and dependable approach for estimating stature. METHODS: This cross‑sectional observational study was conducted among 255 healthy Nigerian adults (130 males, 125 females; 18-65 years) recruited by stratified random sampling from the University of Lagos and Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria, following ethical approval (approval number: CMUL/HREC/0955/19). Stature, femoral length, tibial length, and femoral bi‑epicondylar width were measured using standardized International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) protocols with calibrated instruments (SECA™ stadiometer (Hamburg, Germany), Rosscraft calipers (Campbell, Canada), and Mitutoyo vernier calipers (Kawasaki, Japan). All measurements were taken by a single investigator at fixed times to minimize bias; intra‑observer reliability was assessed by triplicate readings, with mean values recorded. Bilateral measurements were averaged, and outliers were excluded if attributable to error or implausibility. Data were analyzed in IBM SPSS Statistics software, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) after normality and regression assumptions were verified, and sex‑specific and pooled regression models were developed to predict stature. RESULTS: The mean height of males was higher than females, reflecting clear sexual dimorphism in stature. Regression analysis demonstrated strong, statistically significant correlations between stature and femoral/tibial dimensions in both sexes. The pooled models yielded high coefficients of determination (R²) with low standard errors of estimate, indicating good predictive accuracy, with tibial length emerging as the most reliable predictor of stature, offering the greatest accuracy across both sexes (males standard error of estimate (SEE) ± 5.08 cm; females SEE ± 16.02 cm), whereas femoral intercondylar width contributed little to predictive value. CONCLUSION: This study establishes a significant correlation between lower limb dimensions and stature, aligning with trends reported in other groups. The dataset generated offers a valuable forensic reference to aid human identification, particularly in contexts involving fragmented or mutilated remains. By providing population‑specific standards, this work enhances the application of lower‑limb metrics in forensic practice within Nigeria. There is a need to broaden research across diverse Nigerian ethnic groups, conduct cross-validation on skeletal remains, and integrate advanced analytical tools to enhance applicability. Also, incorporating artificial intelligence and computational modelling offers further potential to refine accuracy and strengthen cross‑validation of regression models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".