MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416122807 · doi:10.1115/1.4070392

Analysis of Key Operating Parameters for Water Electrolysis Integrated With Offshore Wind Power

2025· article· en· W4416122807 on OpenAlexaff
Portia Minnah, Kevin Pope

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen productionElectrolysis of waterRenewable energyHydrogenPolymer electrolyte membrane electrolysisHigh-pressure electrolysisElectrolysisWind powerOffshore wind power

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, a systems model approach is used to analyze proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis integrated with offshore wind turbines. Using a validated matlab Simulink (Simscape) model, the effects of temperature, pressure, exchange current density, and membrane thickness on the polarization curve and hydrogen production rates were analyzed. The analysis incorporates a custom block for the membrane electrode assembly and a network of interconnected components. System components, such as the thermal liquid network, two separate moist air networks for hydrogen and oxygen flow, and a circulation pump for continuous water supply, are integrated into the modeling. Wind data are imported into Simulink to represent the offshore wind power supply. Comparative analysis of steady and intermittent power operations revealed that intermittent operation led to slightly reduced hydrogen production due to prolonged off periods. However, intermittent operation increased hydrogen production efficiency due to reduced loads. Part-load performance analysis highlighted declining efficiency at higher power levels, whereas lower power levels increased efficiency. Results also showed that higher temperatures and thinner membranes significantly reduced cell voltage and enhanced hydrogen production, while increased exchange current density improved efficiency by lowering activation overpotential. Pressure had a minimal effect on hydrogen production but slightly increased cell voltage. These findings provide insights for optimizing PEM electrolyzers in renewable energy systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.617

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic EngineeringSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207