MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelling Water Inertia in District Heating Network with Fast Initialization Scheme

2025· article· W4416125009 on OpenAlexaff
Yizhong Hu, Janesh Rupasinghe, Jalal Dadkhah, Yi Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicIntegrated Energy Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsRTDS Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationInertiaScheme (mathematics)Control theory (sociology)Variable (mathematics)Relation (database)Resistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RTDS<sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">®</sup> starts to explore the modelling of multi-energy systems due to users’ demand. This paper focuses on the hydraulic part modelling of district heating network pipe using equivalent circuits. The existing model uses a variable resistor to represent the relation between the pressure and the mass flow rate, which in fact is only valid for the steady state. Therefore, an additional inductor is proposed to properly model the dynamics, i.e., the water inertia. A practical fast initialization scheme is then introduced to reduce the required initialization time. Simulation results demonstrate the importance of modelling water inertia in district heating networks, and the effectiveness of the proposed initialization scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntegrated Energy Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207