MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416126220 · doi:10.1002/asmb.70053

A Leptokurtic‐Form Birnbaum‐Saunders Distribution With Applications to Finance

2025· article· en· W4416126220 on OpenAlexaff
David Sánchez‐Vega, Filidor Vilca, Camila Borelli Zeller, N. Balakrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsKurtosisMultivariate statisticsUnivariateMarginal distributionDistribution (mathematics)Conditional probability distributionMixing (physics)Multivariate normal distributionHeavy-tailed distribution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We propose here a new multivariate Birnbaum‐Saunders (BS‐type) distribution characterized by its leptokurtic property, making it particularly useful in the field of finance. Unlike the approach of Romeiro et al., our proposal is also based on scale mixtures of normal distributions (SMN), but with the mixing variable following a BS distribution, resulting in an asymmetric distribution. This new distribution captures leptokurtic character in the distribution, which implies heavier tails and a more pronounced peak compared to BS or StBS distributions (BS based on the Student‐t distribution), enabling more realistic modeling of financial data. The resulting multivariate BS‐type distribution is an absolutely continuous distribution whose marginal and conditional distributions have leptokurtic properties as compared to the usual univariate BS distribution. These results are a potentially necessary supplement to the recent work of Romeiro et al. This new distribution has not been discussed yet in the literature, and it enriches the family of multivariate BS distributions as it adds new features that take advantage of the presence of observations quite concentrated around the mode. By using the nice hierarchical representation, we have developed a fast and accurate EM (Expectation‐Maximization) algorithm for computing the maximum likelihood estimates, and simulation studies show its good performance, and the corresponding asymptotic properties of the estimates. Finally, we illustrate the results with a real dataset, showcasing the effectiveness and practical utility of the proposed distribution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Stochastic Models in Business and IndustrySame topicStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207