Al-based functionally graded super-intermetallic compounds for the turbine blade of a high-performance jet engine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An Al-based functionally graded structure is fabricated, featuring a discrete compositional gradient of 48.1Al47.9Ti4.0V/73.7Al24.2Ti2.1V/89.5Al10.0Ti0.5V in atomic percentage. This structure is produced via dual-hybrid laser powder bed fusion and directed energy deposition combined with computer numerical control milling. Particularly remarkable is the high tensile strength, ranging from 0.5 to 1.7 GPa. This strength is attributable to three key factors: (1) rapid solidification during inert gas flow following high-energy laser irradiation, (2) the formation of γ-like intermetallic matrix phases along with γ′-like (α 2 -based in the composition of 48.1Al47.9Ti4.0V) intermetallic precipitate phases, and (3) the presence of segregates and precipitates with more V-based compounds at the grain boundaries, distinguishable by their sizes, shapes, and distributions across the microstructures. In addition, (4) large anisotropically lamellar precipitate phases, several hundreds of nanometers in diameter, are predominantly observed in the dendritic regions. Owing to these Al-based intermetallic compounds, each exhibiting low densities (2.9−3.7 g cm −3 ) and high thermal resistances (450−900 °C), the functionally graded structure is then employed in the topological optimization of a turbine blade system for a high-performance jet engine. This process involves identifying the stress-bearing regions, removing any stress-free areas, and applying a structural-stiffness-increasing mechanism through shape and geometric transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it