MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416129437 · doi:10.17615/ze5a-4y51

Impact of Race and Ethnicity on Outcomes after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation

2025· article· en· W4416129437 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tamila L. Kindwall‐Keller, Amer Beitinjaneh, Sachiko Seo, Jeffrey J. Pu, Neel S. Bhatt, Shahrukh K. Hashmi, Sherif M. Badawy, Haydar Frangoul, Usama Gergis, Vaibhav Agrawal, Akshay Sharma, Leslie Lehmann, Wael Saber, Leo F. Verdonck, Yachiyo Kuwatsuka, David I. Marks, Hemalatha G. Rangarajan, Muhammad Bilal Abid, Charles F. LeMaistre, Sanghee Hong, Hasan Hashem, Bipin N. Savani, Tao Wang, Karen K. Ballen, Naya He, Nosha Farhadfar, William A. Wood, Hillard M. Lazarus, Lena E. Winestone, Jason Tay, Jennifer M. Knight, César O. Freytes, Raquel M. Schears, Amir Steinberg, David Gómez‐Almaguer, Miguel Ángel Díaz

Bibliographic record

VenueUNC Libraries · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesOffice of Naval ResearchLegend BiotechPharmacyclicsTakeda OncologyHealth Resources and Services AdministrationMorphoSysSeagenAstellas PharmaAdaptive BiotechnologiesKiadis Pharmabluebird bioJazz PharmaceuticalsBeiGeneHistoGeneticsAtara BiotherapeuticsCareDxActinium PharmaceuticalsNational Cancer InstituteGilead SciencesSanofiGlaxoSmithKlineCSL BehringBristol-Myers SquibbAstraZenecaSwedish Orphan BiovitrumOmeros CorporationVertex PharmaceuticalsAlexion PharmaceuticalsMallinckrodt PharmaceuticalsAstellas Pharma USAmgenNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationIncytePfizerGateway for Cancer ResearchAmerican Society of Hematology
KeywordsUnivariate analysisUmbilical Cord Blood TransplantationMultivariate analysisSingle CenterCohortUmbilical cordRetrospective cohort studyTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueUNC LibrariesSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207