Optimizing MS Parameters for Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) to Enhance Untargeted Metabolomics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) has emerged as a powerful mass spectrometry (MS) strategy for comprehensive metabolomics. This study presents a novel short gradient (13 min) nanosensitive analytical method for human plasma analysis using DIA LC-MS/MS, focusing on in-depth optimization of MS parameters to maximize data quality and metabolite coverage. Key MS parameters, including scan speed, isolation window width, resolution, automatic gain control, and collision energy, were systematically tuned to balance the sensitivity and specificity while minimizing interferences. The optimized method enabled the detection of 2,907 features with 675 annotated compounds, leveraging recent progress in nano-LC-MS/MS for multiomics applications and showcasing the possibility of combining proteomics and metabolomics within a single chromatographic system. Ultimately, a comparison was performed between the data acquired through the DIA and DDA MS approaches in the context of untargeted metabolomics. This optimized analytical method yields more robust and reproducible results, thereby expanding the potential for meaningful discoveries across diverse biological fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".