A HOT Dataset: 150,000 Buildings for HVAC Operations Transfer Research
Bibliographic record
Abstract
About 12% of global energy consumption is attributable to heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems in buildings [11]. Machine learning-based intelligent HVAC control offers significant energy efficiency potential, but progress is constrained by limited data for training and evaluating performance across different kinds of buildings. Existing datasets primarily target energy prediction rather than control applications, forcing studies to rely on limited building sets or single-variable perturbations that fail to capture real-world complexity. We present HOT (HVAC Operations Transfer), the first large-scale open-source dataset purpose-built for research into transfer learning in building control. HOT contains 159,744 unique building-weather combinations with systematic variations across envelope properties, occupancy patterns, and climate conditions spanning all 19 ASHRAE climate zones across 76 global locations. We formalise a comprehensive similarity-based framework with quantitative metrics for assessing transfer feasibility between source and target buildings across multiple context dimensions. Our key contributions: (1) a large-scale, open dataset and tooling enabling systematic, multi-variable transfer studies across 19 climate zones; (2) a quantitative similarity framework spanning geometry, thermal, climate, and function; and (3) zero-shot climate transfer experiments showing why realistic context variation matters for HVAC control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".