MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimization of Cathodic Pressure and Temperature in Grid Connected PEME Based Hydrogen Plants

2025· article· W4416136202 on OpenAlexaff
Abdallah F. El-Hamalawy, Hany EZ Farag, Amir Asif

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodic protectionHydrogen productionHydrogenGridBenchmark (surveying)Proton exchange membrane fuel cellOperating temperature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an optimization model for enhancing the operational efficiency and expanding the safe operating range of Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers (PEMEs). The approach focuses on dynamically adjusting cathodic pressure and operating temperature in response to real-time variations in input power, electricity prices, and hydrogen demand. The method involves hourly updates to these parameters to maximize PEME efficiency while maintaining system reliability. The study begins by analyzing the impact of cathodic pressure and temperature variations on PEME performance. Building on these insights, an integrated optimization is developed, encompassing the operating set points, sizing, and scheduling of a PEME-based Hydrogen Production Plant (PEME-HP). The proposed methodology is validated using the IEEE 30-bus benchmark system. Results demonstrate that the optimized framework can achieve up to a 19% reduction in the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) compared to conventional non-optimized commercial operating conditions, underscoring its potential to enhance the economic viability of hydrogen production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207