MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4416136511 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.250492

Predicting drug overdose and death after “before medically advised” hospital discharge

2025· article· en· W4416136511 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Hiten Naik, Daniel Daly‐Grafstein, Xiao Hu, Mayesha Khan, Benjamin Kaasa, Jeffrey R. Brubacher, Trudy Nasmith, Jennifer R. Lyden, Jessica Moe, Alexis Crabtree, Amanda Slaunwhite, John A. Staples

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsCentre for Advancing Health OutcomesUniversity of TorontoInstitute of Population and Public HealthProvincial Health Services AuthorityBritish Columbia Centre on Substance UseBC Centre for Disease Control
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrug overdoseHospital dischargeDrugCause of deathMEDLINEPatient discharge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: "Before medically advised" (BMA) hospital discharge is associated with higher risks for subsequent death and drug overdose. We sought to develop prediction models to estimate the absolute risk of death from any cause and illicit drug overdose after BMA discharge for a given patient. METHODS: We used retrospective population-based administrative health data of a 20% random sample of all British Columbia residents to derive and internally validate regression models to estimate the risks of death (model A) and illicit drug overdose (model B) within 30 days after BMA discharge. Model A included all nonelective, nonobstetrical adult hospitalizations ending in BMA discharge between 2015 and 2019. Model B included only hospitalizations from model A for patients with evidence of prior substance use. We fitted prediction models using logistic regression and validated models using bootstrap-based optimism correction. Candidate predictors included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics available to clinicians during BMA discharge. RESULTS: Of 6440 hospital admissions included in model A, 102 (1.6%) were associated with the death of a patient within 30 days of BMA discharge. Predictors for death included a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 or higher, cancer, and heart disease. Model A exhibited good discrimination (C-statistic = 0.78) and excellent calibration. Of 4466 hospital admissions included in model B, 233 (5.2%) were associated with a patient subsequently overdosing within 30 days of BMA discharge. Predictors for drug overdose included homelessness, receipt of social income assistance, opioid use disorder, non-alcohol substance use disorder, overdose in the past year, and discharge from a surgical service. Model B exhibited good discrimination (C-statistic = 0.79) and excellent calibration. INTERPRETATION: Risk prediction models may help clinicians and hospitals identify patients who might benefit from intensive support to prevent death or illict drug overdose after BMA discharge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes→French-language works237,207→