MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Zero Sequence Current-Based Synchronized Lissajous Curves for Event Detection in Distribution Networks Using Waveform Measurement Units

2025· article· W4416137060 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Rasoulnia, Akhtar Hussain, Milad Izadi, Innocent Kamwa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLissajous curveWaveformRobustness (evolution)Sequence (biology)Stability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)Transient (computer programming)Event (particle physics)Euclidean distance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distribution Networks (DNs) are advancing by integrating digital technologies and renewable energy to enhance efficiency and resilience. In this context, waveform measurement units (WMUs) are seen as a potential solution for detecting transient events and ensuring grid stability due to their ability to provide high-resolution data. Inspired by WMUs' capabilities, this paper proposes a novel approach for event detection using synchronized Lissajous curves using the zero sequence of current waveforms. This data-efficient method leverages zero-sequence components to sensitively detect asymmetrical events. An index (K) is proposed based on peak Euclidean distance values between samples and does not require prior knowledge of the distribution network topology. The proposed method is able to detect high-impedance faults and capacitor bank switching directly in the time domain without pre-processing. Testing on an IEEE-34 bus system demonstrates the robustness and adaptability of the proposed index K, which remains stable under normal conditions and shows distinct responses to each event type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207