Lithological Controls on Aqueous Phosphorus on Ocean-covered Exoplanets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract On Earth, weathering of subaerial continental crust is necessary for the delivery of phosphorus (P)—a critical nutrient for life—to the oceans. However, P inputs, and therefore the potential for nutrient limitation on biological productivity, must be different on terrestrial planets completely covered in oceans. Absent subaerial continents, the sole source of P can only be the submarine weathering of oceanic crust. Because nonvolatile dissolved species in the ocean must ultimately be sourced from reactions between seawater and the seafloor, the chemical composition of the oceanic crust is necessarily a primary control on ocean chemistry. Here we use geochemical modeling to explore the relationship between seafloor lithology and aqueous P availability. We find that the concentration of dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) is coupled to the amount of calcium (Ca) in the submarine weathering system. More specifically, higher Ca decreases the solubility of the calcium phosphate mineral fluorapatite, which decreases DIP upon precipitation. Calcium also affects fluorapatite solubility via the precipitation of Ca-bearing carbonate minerals. For example, a decrease in calcite formation—and consequent increase in fluorapatite formation—leads to lower DIP. Because ocean crust Ca abundance controls aqueous Ca, we demonstrate the importance of considering lithological controls on ocean chemistry when assessing the habitability of ocean-covered planets. Lastly, we make first-order predictions that suggest that the range in metallicity of nearby stars—and the inferred resulting exoplanet compositions—could strongly modulate the potential for these stars to host planets with P-rich oceans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".