MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416139549 · doi:10.4064/aa250108-11-3

Existence of normal elements with prescribed norms

2025· article· W4416139549 on OpenAlexafffund
Arthur Fernandes, Daniel Panario, Lucas Reis

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Arithmetica · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsMultiplicative groupPrime (order theory)Extension (predicate logic)Primitive elementMultiplicative functionFinite fieldGalois groupGenerator (circuit theory)Group (periodic table)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For each positive integer n, let Fqn be the unique n-degree extension of the finite field Fq with q elements, where q is a prime power. It is known that for arbitrary q and n, there exist elements β∈Fqn such that the Galois conjugates β,βq,…,βqn−1 form a basis for Fqn as an Fq-vector space. These elements are called normal and they work as additive generators of finite fields. On the other hand, the multiplicative group F∗qn is cyclic and any generator of this group is a primitive element. Many past works have dealt with the existence of primitive and normal elements with specified properties, including the existence of primitive elements whose traces over intermediate extensions are prescribed. Inspired by the latter, we explore the existence of normal elements whose norms over intermediate extensions are prescribed. We combine combinatorial and number-theoretic ideas and obtain both asymptotic and concrete results. In particular, we completely solve the problem in the case where only one intermediate extension is considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa ArithmeticaSame topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207