A double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial examining the effect of MitoQ on myocardial energetics in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxidative stress may be an important driver of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) causing mitochondrial dysfunction and reduced ATP production, which mitochondria-targeted antioxidants, such as MitoQ may improve.1 We investigated whether MitoQ had an effect on myocardial energetics in patients with DCM using 31phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) in a phase-2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants provided written informed consent. The trial was approved by the National Research Ethics Committee (21/LO/0035) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05410873). Inclusion criteria were 1) patients with DCM, 2) LVEF ≤45% on two studies ≥3 months apart, 3) on guideline therapy for ≥3 months, 4) in sinus rhythm, 5) elevated NT-pro-BNP (>250 ng/L if >65 years, > 100 ng/L if ≤65 years). Exclusion criteria were 1) atrial fibrillation, 2) contraindication to CMR or gadolinium, 3) environmental trigger for DCM, 4) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) > 25% 5) current cancer, 6) CoQ10 use and 7) cardiac device. Participants underwent CMR and 31P-MRS on a 3-Tesla scanner (Prisma, Siemens, Germany). Cardiac 31P-MRS was performed using a 20 cm loop transmit-receive coil (Pulse Teq, UK) and a 3-dimensional chemical shift imaging sequence.2 For skeletal muscle energetics, dynamic 31P-MRS was performed with a 15 cm loop transmit-receive coil (Pulse Teq, UK) over the vastus lateralis. With weights on the ankle, participants performed leg raises during two periods of 1 min exercise. This was followed by cine imaging, LGE imaging and extracellular volume (ECV) mapping. NT-pro-BNP was measured (Roche, Switzerland). Patients completed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and a 6-minute walk test.3 Patients were randomized 1:1 stratified by left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV). Identical MitoQ or placebo were dispensed according to randomization code. Trial staff remained blind to allocation. Participants took two 20 mg capsules of MitoQ or placebo daily and had repeat testing at 3 and 12 months (31P-MRS only at 3 months). The primary endpoint was change in myocardial PCr/ATP at 3 months. Secondary endpoints included change in (i) PCr recovery rate time constant in skeletal muscle, (ii) LVESVi, (iii) LVEF, (iv) ECV, (v) NT-pro-BNP, (vi) 6MWT distance and (vii) KCCQ score. 31P-MRS and CMR data were analysed in a standardized fashion by expert operators blind to allocation (OXSA, Oxford, UK4; CMR42 V6.0.3, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Canada). 34 patients had 90% power to detect a difference of 0.28 in change of PCr/ATP, assuming a standard deviation of 0.25, a 2-sided alpha of 0.05 and a 10% drop-out. The effect of MitoQ was assessed using analysis of covariance on Stata V18.0 (StataCorp, TX, USA). Analyses were by modified intention to treat. P < 0.05 was taken as significant. Of 34 eligible patients, 16 were randomized to MitoQ and 18 to placebo (Figure 1A). One withdrew; another had incomplete primary end-point data; 32 participants were included in the primary analysis. Patients randomized to MitoQ were older with higher NT-pro-BNP but less symptomatic (Figure 1A). Rates of heart failure therapy were high. (A) Baseline characteristics by randomized treatment allocation; (B&C) Change in myocardial and skeletal muscle energetics by treatment allocation; (D) Change in primary and secondary end-points by treatment allocation. *Adjusted for baseline value and estimated using analysis of covariance. All differences are summarized as mean (95% CI) except for 6MWT which is summarized as median (95% CI). **6MWT is summarized as median (interquartile range) and P-values calculated using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. After three months, there was no evidence that MitoQ had an effect on myocardial energetics [adjusted mean difference PCr/ATP −0.09 (95% CI −0.24, 0.07); P = 0.27] or skeletal muscle energetics (adjusted mean difference PCr recovery rate time constant (τPCr) −1.3 [95% CI −7.6 to 4.9] seconds; P = 0.67) (Figure 1B/1c). In addition, MitoQ did not affect LVESV, LVEF, ECV, NT-pro-BNP, 6MWT or KCCQ at 3 or 12 months (Figure 1D). Treatment was well tolerated and self-reported compliance was excellent [mean number of missed doses of 0.5 (1.3)]. Fewer adverse events were reported in the MitoQ arm compared to the placebo arm (26 vs. 49); 3 in the MitoQ and 2 in the placebo arm were at least possibly related to treatment; all graded as mild. There were 3 serious adverse events unrelated to treatment, including a heart failure hospitalization in the MitoQ arm and hospitalizations for pulmonary embolism and kidney injury in the placebo arm. This trial provides the first randomized data examining the effect of MitoQ on energetics in DCM. We determine that it is unlikely that MitoQ has an effect on myocardial energetics. Our analysis achieved >90% power to detect an improvement in PCr/ATP of at least 0.25; an effect observed with perhexilene.5 The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval suggests the chance of a clinically significant effect on energetics is very small. The results may therefore reflect that: (i) mitochondrial oxidative stress is not an important mediator of energetic impairment in DCM or (ii) an effect is only present in a sub-group of patients (such as those with severe heart failure). Altered substrate utilization is an alternative mediator of energetic impairment.5 In conclusion, our trial in patients with DCM found that it is unlikely that MitoQ has a clinically significant effect on myocardial energetics. Further work is required to understand energetic dysfunction across the spectrum of DCM, discover the most appropriate therapies and define sub-groups in which they may be most effective. We thank the steering committee chaired by Dr Lisa Anderson. We thank Dr Ana Boshof, Operations Manager, the team at Imperial Clinical Trials Unit and the team at the Cardiovascular Research Centre, Royal Brompton Hospital. We thank Antipodean Pharmaceuticals for providing MitoQ and placebo free-of-charge for the duration of the trial. Brian Halliday (Data curation [lead]; Formal analysis [lead]; Funding acquisition [lead]; Investigation [lead]; Methodology [lead]; Project administration [lead]; Resources [lead]; Supervision [lead]; Writing—original draft [lead]), Michael P Murphy (Conceptualization [supporting]; Funding acquisition [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Resources [supporting]; Supervision [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), John Gregson (Formal analysis [supporting]; Funding acquisition [supporting]; Supervision [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Sanjay K Prasad (Conceptualization [supporting]; Funding acquisition [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Supervision [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), John G F Cleland (Conceptualization [supporting]; Funding acquisition [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Supervision [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Dudley J Pennell (Funding acquisition [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Supervision [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Declan P OE28099Regan (Methodology [supporting]; Supervision [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), James S Ware (Project administration [supporting]; Resources [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Upasana Tayal (Project administration [supporting]; Resources [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Oliver Rider (Investigation [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Software [supporting]; Supervision [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Antonio de Marvao (Investigation [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Project administration [supporting]; Resources [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Mayooran Shanmuganathan (Data curation [supporting]; Project administration [equal]; Resources [equal]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Zoi Tsoumani (Data curation [equal]; Formal analysis [equal]; Investigation [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Project administration [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), Alex Kasiakogias (Data curation [equal]; Formal analysis [equal]; Investigation [equal]; Methodology [supporting]; Project administration [supporting]), Alaine Berry (Data curation [equal]; Formal analysis [equal]; Investigation [equal]; Methodology [equal]), Ben Statton (Data curation [equal]; Formal analysis [equal]; Investigation [equal]; Methodology [equal]; Project administration [equal]; Resources [equal]), Katherine L Smith (Data curation [equal]; Project administration [equal]; Validation [equal]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), Aaraby Ragavan (Data curation [equal]; Formal analysis [equal]; Project administration [equal]; Writing—review & editing [equal]), Ruth Owen (Formal analysis [lead]; Investigation [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Visualization [lead]), Jason N Dungu (Investigation [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Project administration [equal]; Resources [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]), and Ladislav Valkovič (Formal analysis [supporting]; Investigation [supporting]; Methodology [supporting]; Software [supporting]; Supervision [supporting]; Writing—review & editing [supporting]) The study was funded by a British Heart Foundation Intermediate Clinical Research Fellowship (FS/ICRF/21/26019) awarded to BPH and Rosetrees Trust. Funding was also provided by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre. DPO'R is supported by the Medical Research Council (MC_UP_1605/13) and the British Heart Foundation (RG/19/6/34387, RE/24/130023, CH/P/23/80008). L. Valkovic is funded by a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship supported jointly by the Wellcome Trust and The Royal Society (grant 221805/Z/20/Z) and acknowledges the support of Slovak Grant Agencies VEGA (Vedecka grantova agentura MSVVaM SR a SAV; grant 2/0004/23) and APVV (Agentura na Podporu Vyskumu a Vyvoja; grant 21-0299). Antipodean Pharmaceuticals provided MitoQ and placebo free-of-charge for the duration of the trial. None of the funders had any role in data acquisition, analysis or interpretation nor preparation of the manuscript. Anonymized participant data, the study protocol, including the statistical analysis plan, and a data dictionary are available from the time of publication. Appropriate institutional data transfer agreements will be required. Requests should be made via email to the corresponding author along with an analysis proposal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".