Successful In Vitro and In Vivo Treatment of Tinea Pedis with a Nitric Oxide-releasing Gel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Tinea pedis (athlete’s foot) is among the most common superficial fungal infections worldwide, affecting up to 70% of individuals in their lifetime. Caused primarily by Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton interdigitale, it manifests as interdigital maceration, hyperkeratotic scaling, or vesiculobullous eruptions. Treatment is often complicated by increasing resistance to standard antifungal therapies. Nitric oxide (NO), a broad-spectrum antimicrobial with multiple cellular targets, represents a promising alternative. Previous work with a nitric oxide releasing solution (NORS) demonstrated fungicidal efficacy in keratin-rich environments and clinical utility in foot bath studies, but real-world application was limited by treatment logistics. This study evaluates a novel nitric oxide releasing gel (NORS-gel) designed for practical patient use. Aim: To investigate the antifungal efficacy, dermal penetration, mechanism of action, and preliminary clinical performance of NORS-gel in refractory tinea pedis. Methods: Antifungal activity was assessed against T. rubrum and T. mentagrophytes using (1) time-kill assays, (2) zone of inhibition tests across synthetic dermal membranes, and (3) scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for morphological effects. A single-patient case study evaluated safety, tolerability, and clinical efficacy. Treatment involved twice-daily topical application for one week, followed by once-daily use for four weeks. Symptom severity was measured using the Athlete’s Foot Severity Score (AFSS). Results: NORS-gel demonstrated rapid fungicidal activity, achieving complete kill of T. rubrum within one minute and T. mentagrophytes within an average of 2.8 minutes, while placebo had no effect. In dermal membrane assays, NORS-gel penetrated the synthetic barrier and maintained fungicidal efficacy, producing zones of inhibition 57% larger than those with Tolcylen and significantly outperforming tolnaftate, which failed to penetrate. SEM revealed extensive structural disruption, impaired hyphal formation, and fungal cell wall perforations, confirming a fungicidal—not fungistatic—mechanism. In the clinical case, a 37-year-old male with refractory interdigital tinea pedis unresponsive to terbinafine and clotrimazole achieved complete symptomatic resolution after five weeks. AFSS decreased from 24 at baseline to 0 at week 5. Adverse effects were limited to mild, transient yellow skin discoloration and dryness, managed with moisturizer. Conclusions: NORS-gel exhibited rapid, potent fungicidal activity in vitro, effective dermal penetration with sustained efficacy, and striking morphological disruption of fungal structures. Clinically, a refractory case of tinea pedis resolved completely within five weeks of treatment. Nitric oxide’s multifaceted antimicrobial mechanism may reduce risk of resistance development and confer added benefits in wound healing. While these findings are preliminary, they highlight the therapeutic potential of NORS-gel as a novel topical antifungal agent. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm efficacy, optimize dosing regimens, and establish long-term safety. Sponsored: SaNOtize Research and Development Corporation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".