MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416141380 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.0304

CNSC-97. ELECTROCORTICOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS AND DETECTION OF SPEECH NETWORKS IN GLIOMA-INFILTRATED CORTEX

2025· article· en· W4416141380 on OpenAlexaff
Vardhaan Ambati, Amit Persad, Jasleen Kaur, S Herr, Emily Cunningham, Abraham Dada, Justyna Ekhart, Quinn Greicius, A Silva, Paul McMillan Villalobos, Niels Olshausen, Youssef Sibih, Sena Oten, Hunter Yamada, Gray Umbach, Alexander A. Aabedi, Wajd N. Al‐Holou, Jacob Young, Madhumita Sushil, Edward Chang, Mitchel S. Berger, David Brang, Shawn L. Hervey‐Jumper

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon City Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrocorticographyAuditory cortexHuman brainCortex (anatomy)ElectrophysiologyDecoding methodsElectroencephalographyBrain mappingEncoding (memory)Neural activity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Direct cortical stimulation (DCS) is the clinical gold standard for identifying the functional cortex in the human brain, essential for the safe removal of brain lesions. However, DCS can be time- and resource-intensive and yields only one datapoint on each trial. In contrast, subdural electrocorticography (ECoG) is multidimensional, yielding measures of activity across a cortical region. Further, it is unknown which electro-physiological features reliably predict DCS+ regions in patients with gliomas. Accordingly, defining the electro-physiological properties of DCS-positive cortical regions may facilitate the identification of critical language regions, thereby permitting safe glioma resections in communities without access. Leveraging a prospectively collected multicenter electrophysiologic dataset of DCS-positive language regions spatially matched with a subdural ECoG array, we analyzed regions identified as functionally critical (DCS+) versus functionally non-critical (DCS–) during intraoperative language mapping (81 patients). In IDH-mutant gliomas (36 patients; 39 DCS+, 576 DCS–), DCS+ regions exhibited significantly greater, more coordinated speech-related neural activity in the high gamma frequency range (70-150 Hz), indicating stronger task-related electrophysiological coordination at DCS+ sites. These differences persisted even when pair matching each DCS+ to the closest DCS– site (within the same patient/gyrus). Interestingly, these differences were not apparent in the IDH-wildtype cohort (45 patients; 44 DCS+, 479 DCS–). Further, neuronal high gamma time series from IDH-mutant DCS+ sites demonstrated enhanced encoding and decoding of linguistic and semantic features (using neuronal recordings to predict/classify word-level features). Again, this was not apparent in the IDH-wildtype cohort. Finally, we demonstrate that resting-state classifiers can accurately distinguish DCS+ from DCS– regions in IDH-mutant tumors (>88% accuracy, AUROC of 0.817, sensitivity of 0.80, a specificity of 0.917 in an external validation cohort). This capability has the potential to accelerate DCS mapping by guiding surgeons to priority regions, thereby improving surgical efficiency and patient outcomes. As the task-based and resting-state electrophysiologic distinctions were not observed in IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, this suggests a pathology-specific remodeling of cortical language networks following glioma infiltration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207