Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Paper machine press felts often contain seams that facilitate their manufacturing and replacement. However, in industrial practice, breaks in the paper sheet commonly initiate at these seam locations. This study examines how press felt seams affect the local wet strength of high grammage papers. A custom experimental setup was developed to dewater paper using either tensioned seamed felts or two uniform felts separated by a small gap (“gap seam”). The pressed paper was then subjected to tensile testing. The pressure distribution near real press felt seams were mapped with pressure-sensitive film. From this, an “effective gap” was defined as the region with reduced pressure. This effective gap increases linearly with felt tension. The wet strength of paper produced using a seamed felt with a given effective gap matched that of paper pressed with a gap seam of the same size. The tests were conducted under industrially relevant conditions for a cardstock-grade paper, including press felt tension, pressure, furnish, and moisture content. Results showed that paper wet strength near the seam decreases exponentially with increasing seam size. The characteristic length scale of this decay closely matches the average fiber length in the furnish.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it