MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416151501 · doi:10.7868/s3034592825010028

<i>“Deneg net, no vy derzhites' (There’s No Money, but Hang in There)”</i>: New Stable Combinations Associated with the Concept “Money, Finance” in the Russian of the Late 20<sup>th</sup> Century — the first Quarter of the 21<sup>st</sup> Century

2025· article· en· W4416151501 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueРусская речь / Russkaya rech · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiscourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhraseologyGroup (periodic table)Collocation (remote sensing)Semantic fieldQuarter (Canadian coin)NeologismPeriod (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article is devoted to Russian phraseological neologisms representing the concept “money”. Various stable verbal complexes revealing formal and semantic unity in Russian of the late 20th century — the first quarter of the 21st centuries are studied. Neological dictionaries and Internet sources served as the research basis. The material was organized as an ideographic group with thematic blocks within it. In this group there are traditional units replenished with new items (blocks “earn money”, “cause monetary damage”, “difficult economic situation”) and new thematic units reflecting changing reality (blocks “legality of receiving money”, “inflation”, “distribution of (state) funds”, “financial fraud”). Ideographic group “money” is supplemented by idioms, phraseological combinations, compound names, periphrases, phraseological expressions. Original Russian units, borrowings-calques and conditionally authorial expressions are registered. Structurally units correspond to collocations, phrases, prepositional-case combinations. A number of colloquial and professional terminological expressions stand out. Analyzed combinations show low degree of stability and difficulty in deriving the initial form. This structural instability is explained not only by the neological status of the units, but also by such feature of modern phraseology as the greater significance of the image than the unit component structure. At the example of combinations based on the image of printing money it is demonstrated that the internal image of a collocation unites a number of items and turns out to be more significant than the structure of phraseological neologism. In general, the phraseosemantic field “money” in modern Russian is undergoing both quantitative and qualitative changes, but remains productive and nationally specific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.014
Science and technology studies0.0080.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0150.003
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it