A Single-Aliquot, Enrichment-Free Workflow for High-Throughput Plasma Proteome and N-Glycoproteome Profiling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT High cancer mortality rates highlight an urgent need for early detection. Plasma proteomics and glycoproteomics provide minimally invasive routes for biomarker discovery, yet achieving an optimal balance among profiling depth, throughput, and longitudinal reproducibility remains a major challenge for clinical application and translation. To overcome this bottleneck, we present a single-aliquot, enrichment-free, paired-run dual-omics pipeline that concurrently profiles the global plasma proteome and N-glycoproteome from unenriched plasma. Following depletion of top14 abundant plasma proteins, we implemented sequential 23-min narrow-window data-independent acquisition (DIA) and 42-min stepped-collision-energy data-dependent (SCE-DDA) runs from the same plasma digest, delivering a clinical throughput of ∼24 patients/day with deep proteome coverage of 3,756±413 protein groups (PGs) and 1,226±78 glycopeptides per sample, including 303 FDA-approved drug targets. Cross-platform benchmarking with a previous generation instrument demonstrated significantly faster (>10-20 fold) profiling speed to achieve 113 PGs/min and high protein abundance reproducibility (Pearson r > 0.9), confirming cross-instrument transferability. Application to a 300-participant lung cohort (cancer, LDCT-detected non-cancer nodules, and controls) revealed differential expression of S100 and annexin family proteins between cancer and nodules. Paired glycoproteomic analysis (n=30) identified site-specific N-glycosylation alterations in FN1, IGHG2, C3, and MET independent of total protein abundance, uncovering additional biomarker candidates for early lung cancer detection. Together, this dual-omics strategy enables deep, scalable, and reproducible plasma analysis, supporting longitudinal biomarker discovery and validation across instruments and laboratories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".