The Mediating Role of Psychological Needs in the Association Between Work Values and Well‐Being Indicators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The present study investigated the mediating role of basic psychological needs at work in the association between work values to three outcomes related to psychological well‐being at work: work engagement, turnover intention, and emotional exhaustion. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze data from two French–Canadian samples of adult workers ( N 1 = 479; N 2 = 652). Results suggested that intrinsic–social work values promote well‐being at work. Moreover, this study highlights the psychological cost of endorsing extrinsic and status work values. Meanwhile, psychological need satisfaction at work mediated the association between intrinsic–social work values and two outcomes: work engagement and turnover intention. Also, psychological need frustration at work mediated the association between extrinsic work values and emotional exhaustion. These findings suggest that career development and organizational interventions should promote intrinsic–social work values to enhance and support psychological well‐being at work.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it